Is there any other feedback on introducing __ARGS__ (see first post) besides AST macros being better? It's much simpler implementation-wise.
seems like my original post regarding __ARGS__ was completely
hijacked by the discussion on AST macros (however fruitful and
interesting). I agree macros would solve this issue while
providing a much more general solution, however, it's very
unclear when that would be implemented, surely not anytime soon.
- Re: feature request: __ARGS__ for logging (cf __FILE__, __... Jacob Carlborg
- Re: feature request: __ARGS__ for logging (cf __FILE_... Timon Gehr
- Re: feature request: __ARGS__ for logging (cf __F... Jacob Carlborg
- Re: feature request: __ARGS__ for logging (cf... Timon Gehr
- Re: feature request: __ARGS__ for logging... bearophile
- Re: feature request: __ARGS__ for logging... Jacob Carlborg
- Re: feature request: __ARGS__ for logging... bearophile
- Re: feature request: __ARGS__ for logging... bearophile
- Re: feature request: __ARGS__ for logging... Jacob Carlborg
- Re: feature request: __ARGS__ for logging... Jacob Carlborg
- Re: feature request: __ARGS__ for logging... timotheecour
- Re: feature request: __ARGS__ for logging... Jacob Carlborg
- Re: feature request: __ARGS__ for logging... Jacob Carlborg
- Re: feature request: __ARGS__ for logging... Timon Gehr
- Re: feature request: __ARGS__ for logging... Jacob Carlborg
- Re: feature request: __ARGS__ for logging... Timon Gehr
- Re: feature request: __ARGS__ for logging... Jacob Carlborg
- Re: feature request: __ARGS__ for logging... Timon Gehr
- Re: feature request: __ARGS__ for logging... Jacob Carlborg
- Re: feature request: __ARGS__ for logging... dennis luehring
- Re: feature request: __ARGS__ for logging... Jacob Carlborg
