Re: feature request: __ARGS__ for logging (cf __FILE__, __LINE__, __FUNC___)

[Jacob Carlborg]

On 2013-02-05 01:29, Timon Gehr wrote:

Well, ideally something like
ast.match{
     2*(?a)  => a+a,
     (?a)+2  => 2+a,
     (?e)    => e,
}

When I think about it, it can't look like that. What's passed to a macro 
needs to be syntactically valid.

--
/Jacob Carlborg