On 2013-02-03 03:36, timotheecour wrote:
seems like my original post regarding __ARGS__ was completely hijacked
by the discussion on AST macros (however fruitful and interesting). I
agree macros would solve this issue while providing a much more general
solution, however, it's very unclear when that would be implemented,
surely not anytime soon.
Is there any other feedback on introducing __ARGS__ (see first post)
besides AST macros being better? It's much simpler implementation-wise.
Sorry about that. I don't think that __ARGS__ is a bad idea, I just
think that there are several features in D which could be replaced with
a library solution using AST macros (if those were available).
--
/Jacob Carlborg
