On 2013-02-03 09:44, dennis luehring wrote:
i understand that pushing the context und sub-macro is a need
but didn't you define a macro-type by
alias macro (Ast!(string) str) my_macro
and this type can be used by sub-macros like normal typed parameters
I'm not sure I understand the above.
another question:
why Ast! here - can the input any else than a AST?
and why not use your $ notation not also here $string?
Ast would be a type defined, most likely, by druntime. I'm trying to
minimize the syntactic changes needed to implement this feature request.
It's not even sure that the $val syntax would be used. Take a look at
the "ast" macro.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
