On Tue, 2013-04-09 at 00:42 +0200, GoSucksButt wrote: […] > Yes but you are forgetting, Go Sucks Butt! Shitty language all > around, even if C++ wasn't so much faster, still no reason to use > Go. For the performance it offers(Crap), you could use LuaJIT for > a far more enjoyable time(and it has coroutines just like Go, and > probably runs faster).
Not what I would call a well-reasoned or data-driven argument. Have you tried gccgo? BTW Go does not have coroutines. > >> I like D but half of what makes a language useful are > >> tools/IDE's etc, > >> and D is just not comparable to C++ yet on this front. > > > > If that was a major issue then what to say about C++ tooling > > when compared to what Delphi/Java/C# offer. > > Visual Studio + Visual Assist for C++ is not far off from C#, > remaining issue is mostly compilation speed which is the fault of > the monkeys on the C++ committee not seeming to care enough about > this issue(not a priority for C++14 wtf??) Clearly you live in a Windows world. I don't have a licence to go there. Nor the finance. In the Eclipse, IntelliJ IDEA, NetBeans, Emacs, VIM universes, C++ support is hideous especially when templates are involved. Support for Java, Kotlin, Go, Ceylon, Groovy, JRuby, Jython, Python is huge in comparison. Isn't it the case that #include leads directly to uncontrollable compilation times? -- Russel. ============================================================================= Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: sip:[email protected] 41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: [email protected] London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
