Jacob Carlborg wrote: > On 2013-05-21 03:52, Nick Sabalausky wrote: > >Y'know what we need? This compiler flag: > > > > -unittest=pagkage.name.* > > I wouldn't say no to that flag. Hmm, I'm wondering if it's possible > to get the same functionality by implementing your own unit test > runner.
It is possible and we shouldn't push functionality into the compiler when the issue is solvable in a library. https://github.com/jkm/dtest (shameless plug) has the command line switch --include to specify which modules should be tested. Jens
