On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 12:35 AM, Jens Mueller <[email protected]>wrote:
> Jacob Carlborg wrote: > > On 2013-05-21 03:52, Nick Sabalausky wrote: > > >Y'know what we need? This compiler flag: > > > > > > -unittest=pagkage.name.* > > > > I wouldn't say no to that flag. Hmm, I'm wondering if it's possible > > to get the same functionality by implementing your own unit test > > runner. > > It is possible and we shouldn't push functionality into the compiler > when the issue is solvable in a library. > https://github.com/jkm/dtest (shameless plug) has the command line > switch --include to specify which modules should be tested. > > Jens > That looks good, will try. However it doesn't address the issue of individual unittests (see 2nd post). Compiler support is needed for named unittests.
