On 2013-05-21 14:34, Jens Mueller wrote:
I have already seen it. I'm also looking for a more natural way to write
tests. dspec goes in that direction but I found its syntax
(describe("...") in {} and it("...") in {}) not convincing.
I really, REALLY would like to be able to have a syntax like this:
describe("foo")
{
it("bar")
{
// asserts
}
}
I was thinking about something like
a.should == 10;
or similar. But that has its own problems. Anyway writing/executing
unittests in D needs to become more fun.
That syntax is the next step for dspec. But that would be put inside the
it-blocks, not instead of. It would be instead of the asserts.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
