On Sun, 31 May 2009 22:45:23 +0400, Vladimir Panteleev <[email protected]> wrote:
> I just went through a ~15000-line project and replaced most occurrences > of void[]. Now the project is an ugly mess of void[], ubyte[] and casts, > but at least it doesn't leak memory like crazy any more. > > I don't know why it was decided to mark the contents of void[] as "might > have pointers". It makes no sense! > FWIW, I also consider void[] as a storage for an arbitrary untyped binary data, and thus I believe GC shouldn't scan it. While it is possible to prevent GC from scanning an arbitrary void[] array, there is no reasonable way to prevent it from scanning all arrays. It is a breaking change, but may be changed for D2. In 99% it is a correct behavior (and a bug in a rest), but reduces application execution speed significantly. ++vote
