Re: Why are void[] contents marked as having pointers?

[bearophile]

Vladimir Panteleev:
> Consider this really basic example of file concatenation:
> auto data = read("file1") ~ read("file2"); // oops! void[] concatenation - 
> minefield created

I think a better design for that read() function is to return ubyte[].
I have never understood why it returns a void[].
To manage generic data ubyte is better than void[] in your program (sometimes 
uint[] is useful to increase efficiency compared to ubyte[]).

Bye,
bearophile