On Thursday, 30 May 2013 at 13:02:24 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Frank Fuente: The syntax with tup() is longer but less noisy.
I prefer tup() over the @{} thing, although I would like to have something that looks like "a syntax" instead of "a function".
On Thursday, 30 May 2013 at 13:02:24 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Frank Fuente: The syntax with tup() is longer but less noisy.
I prefer tup() over the @{} thing, although I would like to have something that looks like "a syntax" instead of "a function".