Re: A different tuple syntax

[dennis luehring]

Am 30.05.2013 15:43, schrieb dennis luehring:

Am 30.05.2013 15:02, schrieb bearophile:

Frank Fuente:

My eyes, they burn...

It looks a bit like Perl, it's not very nice, but for me it's not
easy to find something significantly better.
The syntax with tup() is longer but less noisy.

Bye,
bearophile

what about !(float, double, real) because the tupple syntax is near to
template parameters

sadly not context free and indentical strange like !{float, double, real}