On Thursday, 30 May 2013 at 14:06:15 UTC, Diggory wrote:
Could also do something in the style of token strings, ie.t{ ... }It's lighter than "tup" and there's a precedent for it already in the language with q{ ... } which also means there should be no issues parsing it.
These are the hacks that bring languages into a kind of brainfuck syntax. Why not keep a language easy readable and understandable. A precedence does not imply that it is a desirable thing to have.
