On 7/1/2013 9:46 AM, Ary Borenszweig wrote:
On 7/1/13 1:45 PM, John Colvin wrote:
T)(T var)
{
auto myVar = var.to!string;
//do something with myVar string
}
Ah, that's also ok. But then you have to remember to use myVar instead of var.
Heck, why bother with different variable names at all? We can just use x for all
variables, t for all types, and f for all functions!
t f(t x)
{ t x;
t x = x & 0xFF;
if (x == x)
x = 0;
else if ((x & 0xFFFD00) == 0x0F3800)
x = x[(x >> 8) & 0xFF];
else if ((x & 0xFF00) == 0x0F00)
x = x[x];
else
x = x[x];
return x & x;
}
Sorry for the sarcasm, but I just don't get the notion that it's a burden to use
a different name for a variable that has a different type and a different
purpose. I'd go further and say it is a bad practice to use the same name for such.
