On 7/1/13 9:59 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
Sorry for the sarcasm, but I just don't get the notion that it's a burden to use a different name for a variable that has a different type and a different purpose. I'd go further and say it is a bad practice to use the same name for such.
Reducing the number of names seems worthless, but increasing it can be quite annoying.
Andrei
