On Wednesday, 24 July 2013 at 09:43:12 UTC, monarch_dodra wrote:
Designing a new "std.random2" or "std.rand" should be high on our todo list. That, and I think "std.random" should go the way of "std.xml": A big fat warning telling users it is doomed for replacement, and, perhaps, a brief explanation of the problems, and their potential workarounds.
It's on my list. As you know I've in the short term been trying to fix all the issues that can be fixed without breaking the API. I will try and follow up next month with a more concrete random2 spec and sample code.
