On Mon, 2013-09-23 at 10:53 -0700, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: > void deallocate(void[] buffer); > > This is because the size of D objects is naturally known: classes > have > it in the classinfo, slices store it, and the few cases of using bald > pointers for allocation are irrelevant and unrecommended.
One concern though: void[] is just a slice, who guarantees that the size matches the one that was allocated? Is the allocator assumed to handle this correctly: auto arr = allocate(100); auto arr2 = arr[50..100]; arr = arr[0..50]; deallocate(arr); deallocate(arr2); ? Or is the user simply obliged to use the originally returned range? Best regards, Robert
