On 24 September 2013 00:04, Andrei Alexandrescu < [email protected]> wrote:
> On 9/22/13 10:20 PM, Benjamin Thaut wrote: > >> Am 23.09.2013 01:49, schrieb Andrei Alexandrescu: >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> >>> 2. Untyped allocator - traffics exclusively in ubyte[]. >>> >>> >> Why "ubyte[]" and not "void[]"? >> > > It's the logical choice at this level. > > ubyte[] == "these are octets" Isn't that what void[] also means? Except it says "these are un-typed octets, ie, not a sequence of typed integers in the range 0-255".
