On 9/23/13 7:07 AM, Manu wrote:
On 24 September 2013 00:04, Andrei Alexandrescu <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:On 9/22/13 10:20 PM, Benjamin Thaut wrote: Am 23.09.2013 01:49, schrieb Andrei Alexandrescu: Hello, 2. Untyped allocator - traffics exclusively in ubyte[]. Why "ubyte[]" and not "void[]"? It's the logical choice at this level. ubyte[] == "these are octets" Isn't that what void[] also means? Except it says "these are un-typed octets, ie, not a sequence of typed integers in the range 0-255".
I think void[] means "objects of unknown type". Andrei
