I've been reading the "Case Range Statement" topic with some interest.

It has occurred to me that all those problems would be solved if array
indices started with 1 instead of 0. Just let arrays be indexed from 1 to
size and make the a..b syntax inclusive.

I'll be expecting this change to be put in D forthwith. ;-)

No, but seriously. Complete loss of backwards compatibility aside, wouldn't
this change solve the range problem to everyones satisfaction? Like, in
theory?

-- 
Michiel Helvensteijn

Reply via email to