On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 10:48 AM, Michiel Helvensteijn<[email protected]> wrote: > I've been reading the "Case Range Statement" topic with some interest. > > It has occurred to me that all those problems would be solved if array > indices started with 1 instead of 0. Just let arrays be indexed from 1 to > size and make the a..b syntax inclusive. > > I'll be expecting this change to be put in D forthwith. ;-) > > No, but seriously. Complete loss of backwards compatibility aside, wouldn't > this change solve the range problem to everyones satisfaction? Like, in > theory?
I think the answer is "no". Probably most everything to say about it has already been said in this thread: http://lambda-the-ultimate.org/node/1950 --bb
