== Quote from Michiel Helvensteijn ([email protected])'s article > I've been reading the "Case Range Statement" topic with some interest. > It has occurred to me that all those problems would be solved if array > indices started with 1 instead of 0. Just let arrays be indexed from 1 to > size and make the a..b syntax inclusive. > I'll be expecting this change to be put in D forthwith. ;-) > No, but seriously. Complete loss of backwards compatibility aside, wouldn't > this change solve the range problem to everyones satisfaction? Like, in > theory?
I've suggested 0.5 as a compromise in the past (ok I haven't but that's beside the point). I feel that this suggestion was dismissed without fair consideration.
