On 2013-11-11 11:28, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
I can understand wanting to have a high level version of it in context. I'm just considering a high reuse language feature that could back it. Really it should have been added a while ago given the static assert trick is used a bit. I do actually like the idea of having the ability to call it on context with a bunch of extra information given to it for you. e.g. line number of initiation ext.
I think we want to have as much as possible of this collected in the same place. I don't think pragmas are a good fit for this.
-- /Jacob Carlborg
