On Monday, 11 November 2013 at 10:47:37 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2013-11-11 11:28, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
I can understand wanting to have a high level version of it in
context.
I'm just considering a high reuse language feature that could
back it.
Really it should have been added a while ago given the static
assert
trick is used a bit.
I do actually like the idea of having the ability to call it
on context
with a bunch of extra information given to it for you. e.g.
line number
of initiation ext.
I think we want to have as much as possible of this collected
in the same place. I don't think pragmas are a good fit for
this.
Yes I do agree with that. I'm just more worried about what backs
it then pleasantries that we can give the developer.
Also if you're not looking towards pragma's to hook into stopping
compilation what are your ideas and thoughts around this issue?
Because at this point I only know of static assert to do it.
