On 2013-11-11 11:51, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
Yes I do agree with that. I'm just more worried about what backs it then pleasantries that we can give the developer. Also if you're not looking towards pragma's to hook into stopping compilation what are your ideas and thoughts around this issue? Because at this point I only know of static assert to do it.
A function call on the context parameter as I've already showed. This would just call "error" which is already implemented in the compiler. Although I don't know how to actually do the connection between the compiler internals the user code. I think this is one of the big challenges with this DIP. For this function I guess it could be done like an intrinsic (is that the correct word?).
-- /Jacob Carlborg
