On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 11:39:56PM +0100, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
> On 16/12/13 23:30, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> >I guess if we need several versions of between, we could give up on it.
>
> What's wrong with having it implemented analogous to
> std.random.uniform -- taking a bounds parameter which allows for
> open and/or closed at either end, with the default being "[)" ... ?
>
> By the way, I'd also like to see that open/closed-at-either-end
> specialization extended to std.range.iota().
Oooh, do I hear a volunteer for cleaning up iota? ;-)
While you're at it, you might as well implement:
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10762
:-P
T
--
The peace of mind---from knowing that viruses which exploit Microsoft system
vulnerabilities cannot touch Linux---is priceless. -- Frustrated system
administrator.
