On 12/16/13 2:39 PM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
On 16/12/13 23:30, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I guess if we need several versions of between, we could give up on it.
What's wrong with having it implemented analogous to std.random.uniform
-- taking a bounds parameter which allows for open and/or closed at
either end, with the default being "[)" ... ?
Too much sophistication for too trivial work. One between would be fine.
Four would be probably overdoing it. So I'm retracting my proposal for
between.
Andrei
