On Monday, 16 December 2013 at 22:53:24 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
What's wrong with having it implemented analogous to
std.random.uniform -- taking a bounds parameter which allows
for
open and/or closed at either end, with the default being "[)"
... ?
By the way, I'd also like to see that open/closed-at-either-end
specialization extended to std.range.iota().
Oooh, do I hear a volunteer for cleaning up iota? ;-)
While you're at it, you might as well implement:
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10762
:-P
T
Well, I might actually volunteer :)
Any pointer about implementing that enhancement? Can one just
forgot about the different versions (one for integrals, one for
floating points) and just implement the One True Iota?
