On Sunday, 2 February 2014 at 07:35:21 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
No.
What I'm driving at is that right now the type is A, as is in a
variety of other situations. It would be a whole different
language that would be wholly incompatible with D.
What do you think about my `scope` proposal? It does not
introduce any new syntax and should be somewhat in line with
existing reference escape analysis.
By the way, Sonke Ludwig has recently named scope +
unique/isolated qualifiers as one of more promising D
improvements for vibe.d : "having this in the core language would
open up a lot of potential for performance and safety
improvements and I feel that it needs more advertisement to
really reach the decision makers - and of course the general
community"
