On Sunday, 2 February 2014 at 14:37:50 UTC, Namespace wrote:
I have originally wanted to write it down in DIP form but at
that time Andrei has said that implementing scope is out of
question. Wondering if his opinion has changed :)
What? When did he say that? And why?
Well, wording was a bit different but from DIP36 discussion
thread
(http://forum.dlang.org/post/[email protected]):
It defines a new language feature instead of improving the
existing ones. At this point in the development of the
language, our preference should be putting the existing
features in good order.
+
> You consider "scope" a new language feature?
Yes.
I can be wrong but I have interpreted this as "no plans to
actually implement scope in any forseeable future"
