On 2/2/14, 2:53 AM, Dicebot wrote:
On Sunday, 2 February 2014 at 07:35:21 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:No.What I'm driving at is that right now the type is A, as is in a variety of other situations. It would be a whole different language that would be wholly incompatible with D.What do you think about my `scope` proposal?
I think that's more likely to be made to work. Andrei
