Daniel Keep Wrote: > Let's all create our own DIPs as slight variations of existing ones when > we disagree instead of actually working together!
People draw their proposals, they are criticised and new proposals are drawn. This is how discussion works. > Is there ANY reason this couldn't have been put into DIP4 as an > alternative solution? I didn't thought it's meant to work this way. > This isn't even an objective proposal... > > "Parts of DIP4 are too puristic and as a consequence - insane." No > objective reasoning given; just calling DIP4 "insane." Yeah, it may lack political correctness.
