Jason House wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu Wrote:
grauzone wrote:
This is *exactly* why I said DIPs need to have some form of editorial
control.
I agree. DIPs shouldn't just be "newsgroup postings with higher
exposure". At least we'd need a higher entry barrier, like some checking
for formal requirements. Yay for bureaucracy.
I agree. That bureaucracy should be community-enforced; Walter and I
lack the resources to add to organizing DIPs, though we'd be glad to try
them.
Andrei
I'm coming to the sad conclusion that DIPs will be as ineffective as bugzilla.
Why do you assume bugzilla is ineffective? I think it's a lifesaver.
I haven't seen Walter voice an opinion on any DIP so far. We desperately need
to get a DIP through a full cycle. Has anything gotten past the draft stage?
Walter is cautiously optimistic about DIP. He'd be as happy to give them
a try as anyone else.
Andrei