Andrei Alexandrescu Wrote: > grauzone wrote: > >> This is *exactly* why I said DIPs need to have some form of editorial > >> control. > > > > I agree. DIPs shouldn't just be "newsgroup postings with higher > > exposure". At least we'd need a higher entry barrier, like some checking > > for formal requirements. Yay for bureaucracy. > > I agree. That bureaucracy should be community-enforced; Walter and I > lack the resources to add to organizing DIPs, though we'd be glad to try > them. > > > Andrei
I'm coming to the sad conclusion that DIPs will be as ineffective as bugzilla. I haven't seen Walter voice an opinion on any DIP so far. We desperately need to get a DIP through a full cycle. Has anything gotten past the draft stage?
