On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 07:28:33PM +0000, Frustrated wrote: > Is that not just C+++? When the gc and allocation gets fixed > we'll end up with C++++? > > Then don't we have D = C^n for some n? Does this hold for > negative numbers? Complex numbers?
I have enough trouble imagining C^n for irrational n, nevermind negative numbers or complex numbers! T -- Some ideas are so stupid that only intellectuals could believe them. -- George Orwell
