On Friday, 14 February 2014 at 20:11:19 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Fri, 14 Feb 2014 14:28:33 -0500, Frustrated <[email protected]> wrote:Is that not just C+++? When the gc and allocation gets fixed we'll end up with C++++?No, C+++ isn't valid, and I don't know about C++++, but I'm suspecting no.The next generation would be C+=2 :P -Steve
(++C)++ It looks silly, but it's valid in D!
