On Fri, 14 Feb 2014 15:27:46 -0500, Jeremy DeHaan
<[email protected]> wrote:
My original idea was to be (C++)++, which makes sense
conceptually, but wasn't valid code. :P
Actually, it doesn't make sense. C++ increments C, but returns the value
that C was before the increment. So it returns a temporary. Incrementing a
temporary is not allowed (where would the incremented value go?), and even
if it were allowed, would likely not be what you want ;)
++++C may be valid, but is butt-ugly.
C+=2 is just far superior on all fronts!
-Steve
