On 3/9/14, Vladimir Panteleev <[email protected]> wrote: > I don't think it was an intentional change, rather a mundane > regression. Could you post the affected code?
Breaking code wasn't intended. On 3/9/14, Andrei Alexandrescu <[email protected]> wrote: > I wonder how we can improve the process to avoid such issues in the future. The obvious answer is to have proper unittests. If the API broke, the existing tests should have caught this. But the tests weren't touched in the pull request, only new ones were added. What exactly broke though?
