On Sunday, 9 March 2014 at 17:30:32 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 3/9/14, 6:49 AM, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 3/9/14, Walter Bright <[email protected]> wrote:
BTW, I don't know if better unittest coverage would have
detected this
particular breakage, but in any case, we should do better
with coverage.
Can someone finally say *what* broke?
I was wrong in my previous message. As Adam noted, it was
making type read-only. Previously people would write:
v.type = JSON_TYPE.STRING;
v.str = "abc";
Now the second line sets the type, and the first is an error.
Also, this code is in error:
v.type = JSON_TYPE.TRUE;
and must be replaced with:
v = true;
I think this is something that can be easily fixed without
causing more regressions. Have you filed it as an issue yet?
