On Saturday, 26 April 2014 at 18:52:41 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 4/26/2014 11:30 AM, Dicebot wrote:
Compromise - consider namespace definition from extern(C++)
during name
resolution. But still keep actual feature tied to
"extern(C++)" to keep its use
case clear.
I mentioned something similar in a previous reply to you. Hope
that means we can reach a consensus.
Well this corrected version shifts my negative attitude to just
"I don't like it" from "I tremble in despair reading it" :) In
that sense, it is a breakthrough!
I like Andrei's proposal much-much more though. There needs to be
a good tool to interface to C++ namespaces, no doubt. But it
should not impact pure D code and it does not need to follow
exact C++ code style. Forcing module separation sounds awesome
and can be trivially done by binding generator, i.e. dstep.
