On 04/26/2014 08:15 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 4/26/2014 5:37 AM, Timon Gehr wrote:
import std.stdio;
namespace g{
int foo(int a){ return a; }
}
namespace g{
string foo(string a){ return a; }
}
void main(){
writeln(foo(2));
writeln(foo("a"));
writeln(g.foo(2));
writeln(g.foo("a"));
}
Both examples should still work if the two mixins/namespaces occur in
(possibly
different) imported modules. I think this would be in line with how
lookup is
generally handled in D. (Note that I am not suggesting to make namespaces
extensible, but rather to make them overloadable.) How do you think
about this?
Yes, that's how I anticipate it working.
Nice.
That's just following existing rules.
The example with the mixins does not actually compile. I have filed this:
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12659
