On Tue, 29 Apr 2014 16:00:43 -0400, Steven Schveighoffer
<[email protected]> wrote:
On Tue, 29 Apr 2014 15:52:01 -0400, Walter Bright
<[email protected]> wrote:
Because the compiler would now issue an error for that, it's its
anti-hijacking feature.
Try it and see!
I agree! that was my central point, which Timon seemed to be arguing
against :)
And in fact, so were you!
On Mon, 28 Apr 2014 16:50:45 -0400, Walter Bright
<[email protected]> wrote:
On 4/28/2014 7:27 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
module foo;
void func() {}
module bar;
extern(C++, foo) void func(); // foo::func in C++ land
module prog;
import foo;
import bar;
void main()
{
func(); // error
foo.func(); // ALSO error
No, not an error. Why would it be?
This is EXACTLY the same code that you said would now be an error above!
I think you guys need to reexamine this, and choose one way or another. At
this point, I have no clue as to how it's supposed to work.
-Steve
