Re: DIP61: redone to do extern(C++,N) syntax

[via Digitalmars-d]

On Tuesday, 29 April 2014 at 22:51:42 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu 
wrote:
On 4/29/14, 12:49 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 4/29/2014 8:43 AM, Timon Gehr wrote:
as the DIP _does not actually introduce any new lookup rules_
[...]
In particular, any problems you find with symbol lookup are 
actually
orthogonal
to the DIP.

Yes!

This is a biggie. KISS etc. -- Andrei

KISS: keep 'em seperate

!KISS: map language 1 onto language 2

Wrong KISS: compiler internals over specification