Is "a=b" syntactical sugar for "tmp = b; a = b"? No.
I meant "tmp=b; a=tmp", of course… :-P
On Sunday, 29 June 2014 at 21:37:29 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
- Re: shorter altern... Xinok via Digitalmars-d
- Re: shorter alternative of... Dicebot via Digitalmars-d
- Re: shorter alternative of con... Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d
- Re: shorter alternative of con... bearophile via Digitalmars-d
- Re: shorter alternative of con... Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d
- Re: shorter alternative of... H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d
- Re: shorter alternative of con... Gary Willoughby via Digitalmars-d
- Re: shorter alternative of... bearophile via Digitalmars-d
- Re: shorter alternativ... Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d
- Re: shorter alternativ... via Digitalmars-d
- Re: shorter altern... via Digitalmars-d
- Re: shorter alternative of construc... Kapps via Digitalmars-d
- Re: shorter alternative of con... SomeDude via Digitalmars-d
- Re: shorter alternative of... H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d
- Re: shorter alternative of... Chris Cain via Digitalmars-d
- Re: shorter alternative of... bearophile via Digitalmars-d
- Re: shorter alternative of construc... Shammah Chancellor via Digitalmars-d
- Re: shorter alternative of con... Kapps via Digitalmars-d
- Re: shorter alternative of... simendsjo via Digitalmars-d
- Re: shorter alternative of... Chris Cain via Digitalmars-d
- Re: shorter alternative of construc... Grogan via Digitalmars-d
