On Saturday, 21 June 2014 at 21:25:33 UTC, Kapps wrote:
Personally I'd definitely welcome this syntax. It's an extremely common thing to do, prone to typos / bugs, is a simple syntax, and is something I'm surprised more languages don't have.
I've never seen a single instance of a bug like this in 15 years of Java and C++ programming. One has to be really sloppy in order to insert bugs in such simple code.
