Re: shorter alternative of constructor with parameter

[bearophile via Digitalmars-d]

SomeDude:

I've never seen a single instance of a bug like this in 15 years
of Java and C++ programming. One has to be really sloppy in 
order to insert bugs in such simple code.

Do you mean bugs like this?

class Foo {
    int x;
    this(int x_) {
        x = x;
    }
}

I have had some of them, found and fixed quickly. I think they 
are sufficiently common (unless you have an IDE that generates 
that boilerplate for you).

Bye,
bearophile