Re: RFC: std.json sucessor

[via Digitalmars-d]

On Monday, 25 August 2014 at 20:04:10 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad 
wrote:
I think supporting signaling NaN is important for correctness.

It is defined in C++11:

http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/types/numeric_limits/signaling_NaN