On Monday, 25 August 2014 at 20:04:10 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote:I think supporting signaling NaN is important for correctness.It is defined in C++11: http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/types/numeric_limits/signaling_NaN
I didn't know that. But recall I did implement it in DMC++, and it turned out to simply not be useful. I'd be surprised if the new C++ support for it does anything worthwhile.
