On Tuesday, 26 August 2014 at 04:03:17 UTC, ketmar via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Mon, 25 Aug 2014 16:33:00 +0000
via Digitalmars-d <[email protected]> wrote:

I think the whole separate compilation idea is going to be old fashioned real soon now. It makes little sense to not have the build system as a service run on a cluster and the program as a database with builtin versioning.
but i don't want to buy and setup 42 servers in my room just to compile
"hello world"! ;-)

You won't, your single home computer will be enough for small programs. But if your code ever grows large enough to benefit from a cluster, you'll just sign up for an account online and you tools will automatically start sending your diffs to the remote cluster and compiling the code there.

and no, i will not buy all that modern BS about "clouds".

It is amazing that the "cloud" is being applied to a host of problems, but not really to speed up building software yet. Of course, there's a bunch of giant corporations, like Facebook or Google, putting their own private "clouds" to such uses, but the vast majority of programmers just use a powerful workstation instead, the old '80s model of software development. That will change.

It's not that you can't roll your own and do it on AWS right now, it just isn't dead simple to do it off the shelf, so most don't. And of course test runs have been increasingly pushed into these remote clusters. Other than a few devs with privacy and security concerns, most will move to such a "cloud" model in the coming years.

Reply via email to