On Saturday, 6 September 2014 at 12:52:19 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Sat, 6 Sep 2014 14:52:50 +0200
Marco Leise via Digitalmars-d <[email protected]>
wrote:
E.g. Missing symbols are replaced by a square with the
hexadecimal code point. So the missing symbol can at least be
identified correctly (and a matching font installed).
this can't help me reading texts. really, i'm not a computer, i
don't
remember which unicode number corresponds to which symbol.
Does it really matter? I don't really care if some UTF8 encoded
text can't be displayed properly because it's written in some
Ancient Mayan language and I don't have the right font installed.
Even if I did install that font and manage to get it to display
correctly - I can't read that language!
Learning a language is much harder than installing a font, so
it's a pretty safe assumption that if you can read that language
you can install the font for it...
